✓ Technically demonstrated
Tests run on fictional data: creation after approval, refusal without creation, retries without duplicates, persistence after restart and inspectable technical logs.
PROOF CENTER
See NovaMind work before connecting anything.
A guided 3-minute demo, four sector cases, printable one-pagers and an interactive workflow using fictional data.
EVIDENCE STATUS
What is demonstrated today — and what is not yet demonstrated.
NovaMind separates technical tests, simulations and customer outcomes. No customer outcome is presented as proven before it is measured.
— Not yet demonstrated with a customer
The public Proof Center does not yet contain a measured customer case, observed ROI, customer testimonial or claimed production reference.
→ To be measured in a real pilot
Processing time, quality, human corrections, errors, duplicates, traceability, technical cost and user feedback on an agreed scope.
Demonstrations use fictional data and do not by themselves prove a production business outcome.
MSP DEMONSTRATION01:30
One request. One human decision. One traceable action.
An IT support workflow, with real GitHub screen recordings.
PREVIOUSLY EXECUTED WORKFLOW · FICTIONAL DATA · 90 s
GITHUB · TEST ENVIRONMENT · ORIGINAL FRENCH INTERFACE
YOU STAY IN CONTROL
Eight workstations cannot connect. Fictional customer: Atelier Delta. Support requested.
The request is reviewed. The /valider comment authorizes creation.
The ticket exists in GitHub. Its log links back to the approval.
Fixed rules · no connected CRM · no measured customer savings
4 sectors · 4 concrete situations
From an everyday problem to a prepared action.
Each video presents a distinct workflow in 72 seconds, with English text and music, without voiceover.
Visual reconstructions of tests run on fictional data, not screen recordings. Test decisions are submitted by scripts, without authenticated human approval or connection to customer tools.
Industry · 01:12
Three alerts. One maintenance file.
Three temperature alerts from fictional machine M-04 are grouped with its test history.
Request created locally. No command sent to the machine.
Test result and pilot measurement
Tested: creation after approval, refusal without creation, retries without duplicates and persistence after restart. Fixed rules and a local SQLite database; no measured customer results.
Measure during a pilot: Preparation time, file completeness and corrections.
View test log (JSON; original technical data)Finance · 01:12
Same invoice. Two amounts to review.
Atlas invoice FA-1042: €1,200 recorded, €1,260 received. A €60 difference needs review.
Verification task saved. No payment executed.
Test result and pilot measurement
Tested: creation after approval, refusal without creation, retries without duplicates and persistence after restart. Fixed rules and a local SQLite database; no measured customer results.
Measure during a pilot: Verification time, false positives and corrections.
View test log (JSON; original technical data)Healthcare administration · 01:12
A document is missing. Follow-up is prepared.
Fictional file TEST-017 contains the form, but the requested supporting document is missing.
Draft saved. No message sent and no care decision made.
Test result and pilot measurement
Tested: creation after approval, refusal without creation, retries without duplicates and persistence after restart. Fixed rules and a local SQLite database; no measured customer results.
Measure during a pilot: Preparation time and accuracy of missing-document detection.
View test log (JSON; original technical data)Logistics · 01:12
A delay reported. Follow-up organised.
Shipment EXP-731 matches order CMD-2048 for fictional customer Atelier Horizon.
Task and draft saved together. No message sent.
Test result and pilot measurement
Tested: creation after approval, refusal without creation, retries without duplicates and persistence after restart. Fixed rules and a local SQLite database; no measured customer results.
Measure during a pilot: Preparation time, correct matches and corrections.
View test log (JSON; original technical data)PROOF CENTER
Generic demo · 3 minutes
Choose a case, follow the signal, decision, human approval and final audit trail.
- 01
Signal received
- 02
Context assembled
- 03
Human approval
- 04
Traceable action
Support
Finance
Industry
4 sector mini-cases
Credible end-to-end scenarios without access to your tools.
Sector one-pager
IT & MSP
A priority case arrives with incomplete context.
Before
The team searches several tools, qualifies the request and prepares follow-up manually.
After
NovaMind consolidates context, proposes the next action, requests human approval and records the decision.
Sector one-pager
Staffing & HR
A priority case arrives with incomplete context.
Before
The team searches several tools, qualifies the request and prepares follow-up manually.
After
NovaMind consolidates context, proposes the next action, requests human approval and records the decision.
Sector one-pager
Public services
A priority case arrives with incomplete context.
Before
The team searches several tools, qualifies the request and prepares follow-up manually.
After
NovaMind consolidates context, proposes the next action, requests human approval and records the decision.
Sector one-pager
Industry & operations
A priority case arrives with incomplete context.
Before
The team searches several tools, qualifies the request and prepares follow-up manually.
After
NovaMind consolidates context, proposes the next action, requests human approval and records the decision.
Before / after
Before
Signal → manual search → fragmented decision → copied report
After
Signal → consolidated context → human approval → auditable action
VALIDATION FRAMEWORK
A pilot should produce comparable evidence, not a promise.
Scope, baseline and decision criteria are agreed before the pilot starts. The result may be positive, mixed or insufficient.
1 · Before
Choose one process, measure a comparable sample, and document rules, owners, authorised tools and limits.
2 · During
Record each useful execution: success, failure, human correction, duplicate avoided, time spent and technical cost.
3 · After
Compare with the baseline, collect user feedback and decide whether to continue, correct or stop.
Suggested measures
- ✓ Median processing time
- ✓ Successful execution rate
- ✓ Human corrections
- ✓ Errors and duplicates
- ✓ Audit-trail completeness
- ✓ Technical cost
- ✓ User feedback
No numeric target is presented as a result before observation. No production tool, sensitive decision or additional spend is activated without explicit agreement.
Scope a measurable pilotStandalone demo environment
Test the workflow in-browser with fictional data. No access to your tools and no prospect data.
INTERACTIVE DEMONSTRATION
Test the operating logic, step by step.
Choose a scenario, run the journey and keep the sensitive decision in human hands.
● Functional demonstrationRuns locally in your browser
A priority invoice is overdue.
Follow-up prepared under the scenario rule.
- 1
Signal
A priority invoice is overdue.
- 2
Context
Fictional ERP, CRM and email context assembled.
- 3
Human approval
Human approval required before sending.
- 4
Trace
Approved action recorded in the log.
Fictional data and demonstration logic running in your browser. No connection to your tools or customer outcome is claimed here.